The writing on the wall is change. "Reform, perform or perish" - the self proclaimed market marxist chief minister of the state is fond of saying. But his words have hardly been heeded to, the party and its cadres did not reform themselves, the babus and even his ministerial colleagues did not perform and hence perish, they will. However, the question would still remain, will the coming forces of power "reform, perform or perish"?
A lot has been lost, there is hardly anything more to loose. And, this hopelessness gives a ray of hope to the state. There is no other way to go but forward, provided the wheels of change do not get stuck in the same quicksand.
For decades a squinted view of society and an utter hatred toward anything economically prosperous has reigned in Bengal. Power to proletariat, voice to working class, prescriptions for classless society - all euphoric ideals were dead for a long time, their carcasses were being carried on sagging shoulders. When ideas do not sustain ideals and destination is lost in a maze of conflicting paths what prevails is chaos. So it did. But to be fair, those out of power were as much to blame as those ruling the roost. Anyway this is no time for blame game, its all too obvious. It is time to act and act fast.
Politics, that too of an endangered (also dangerous) variety had ruled over economics in the erstwhile capital of British Indian Empire for long thirty years. Its known that good economics is often considered bad politics, but in Bengal it was both bad politics and bad economics. Red ruled till economy saw red. The green harvest burnt to red chaff and eyes filled with hope shed tears of stiffled aspirations till they turned red. And, those who should have taken up cuddles against the red tyranny scurried off to cocoons of political ignominy.
If those who ruled had no vision, those opposing them too were not seeing too clearly. But today this short sightedness will not do. A whole generation has been brought up on nightmares, its time to dream and make dreams real.
What Bengal did all this while was to believe in a doctrine and to exhibit a different ideal altogether. While the inherent character of the government and the ruling coalition is always opposed to anything that has a market orientation, Buddhadeb flew in on a chariot of "market socialism"- a doctrine neither understood nor accepted by his colleagues. This can be explained by the fact that though back in 1996, under Jyoti Basu, Bengal adopted the New Economic Policy in line with the reforms wagon let loose at the center by Dr. Manmohan Singh, nothing concerete happened on ground. Look at Haldia and the tussle with The Chatterjee Group for example. A haphazard and ad hoc kind of economic strategy was what one could see.The result was chaos and misguided action. The 'reformist' CM wanted trade unionism and business prosperity to coexist, and like all Marxist doctrines (though it was not one of them) it too turned out to be utopian.
The worry now is what next and how. If the writing on the wall is to be heeded those marching towards power have a dismal track record as far as administrative acumen and consistency of ideas and ideals is concerned. We all know how Ms Banerjee has been storming in and out of alliances, how she has been throwing papers on the Chair at the Lok Sabha, how she has been running her ministerial duties and most importantly how very unclear is her vision for Bengal. She has proved to be a credible opposition to the ruling left, atleast ballots say that. Now she has to prove she can do to Bengal what Nitish Kumar has been doing to Bihar.
As I said earlier, its time economics took precedence over politics in Bengal. And, here economics does not mean project clearance and land allocation to the chosen few. If CPIM had red mark all over in their economic and financial score card, Trinamool too does not have any better credentials. Its agitation threw off TATAs from Singur and with that industry's confidence. The way Didi has been running the Indian Railways- giving sops after sops, adding new trains without sprucing infrastructure, adding to losses by refusing to increase fares year after year- it all raises one single question - will she be able to take strong decisions to bring Bengal back on track or will she busy herself in settling political scores?
The state of Bengal will prosper if investor confidence is restored and its best brains make it their home once again. For this to happen there needs to be huge corrective measures in governance, in administration, in financial decisioning and economic outlook. With Maoists digging their heels and demanding their pound of flesh for supporting Trinamool in shaking up the Red regime, how far would the reforms be taken becomes a question mark.
From cities to country side business has to increase penetration. The perennial conflict between the farm and industry needs an amicable solution with long term interest of the state in mind. Rhetoric has rang loud for long - its time some sane voice is heard. But whose? With conflicting interests and mutually exclusive goals high on agenda, coming to a shared vision for the state seems difficult. Its time for all to come together - politicians, industrialists, intelligensia, administrators and common people- and build a common minimum program, a shared vision of a prosperous Bengal. Let the differences rest for a while, there will time to settle scores or prove a point later, now is the time to change - change not only in the hue of the Writers Building, but change of mentality and mindset. For once lets come together for Bengal, the soil that made us all we are today.
dear nidhi. it is a good analysis. "Good economics is considered as a bad politics" is real. Narasimha Rao brought reforms and brought good boom to the nation, but politically, he and his party was lost. Buddha wants to do something, but he is confused. Didi, in her over enthusiasm, drove Tata out of Bengal. Even if Didi comes to power, i do not know, how far, they will be able to convince the industrialists.
ReplyDeleteEven you can compare West Bengal with our Kerala. How many industrialists are willing to put up their show there. they prefer all other states, including Bihar, than to risk with these two states.
I do not blame politicians only. It is also the people who never care for the development of the state. As Dravidian leader Periyar said, we will get the government, which we deserve. earlier, it used to be said, "Yatha Raja, thatha praja" (how is the king, same way people also). Now it is "yatha praja, thatha raja". Unless people show some sensitivity, nothing can be done in these two states.
of course. its ultimately people who decide. but unfortunately in bengal, there is no choice....
ReplyDeleteChoices are made, and not offered. The collective consciousness of Bengal is more reactive than pro-active, I suppose.
ReplyDelete